Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling

To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:45:44 +0200
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CACRpkdYYy_0QnzO-qPusYPFK2qFs=NG-t-X=GRjLg5DHX_k82w@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20240610112700.80819-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20240610112700.80819-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAMRc=MfZ11U+kAh1+K=DxtJ=QL+cY7Q_sBN4sQDF-RNgjpV0QA@mail.gmail.com> <jvnvx7a4pn6evrp5ehfrt4qsiuprq6ogvrue2a3uupwtydmgcm@2rvat7ibvgb4> <CACRpkdYYy_0QnzO-qPusYPFK2qFs=NG-t-X=GRjLg5DHX_k82w@mail.gmail.com>

> It says what it is, not really sloppy but really low-fi.

I think it is sloppy because it cannot guarantee equi-distant sample
points.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH v9 0/1] gpio: add simple logic analyzer using polling
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH v9 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
  - From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
  - From: Linus Walleij