On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 6:03 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Bart] > > I really dislike drivers being called in an ambiguous way like > > "simple" or - in this case "sloppy". I understand why it is - in fact > > - sloppy but can we call it anything else? Like > > "gpio-logic-analyzer.c"? > > Sure, we can if you prefer. I named it like this to make the limitations > super-clear. And even with that in place, I still got a private email > where someone wanted to build a 400MHz-RPi-based logic analyzer device > with it. Which would not only have the latency problems, but also > likely have a max sampling speed of whopping 400kHz. What about "gpio-low-fidelity-logic-analyzer.c" (+/- Kconfig etc adjusted accordingly) It says what it is, not really sloppy but really low-fi. Yours, Linus Walleij
