Re: [PATCH net-next v5 13/17] net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 05:15:24PM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote:
> Hello Oleksij,
> 
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:31:19 +0100
> Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >    
> > > > Should be tested, but if, instead of "vin-supply", we will use
> > > > "pse-supply" it will make most part of pse_regulator.c obsolete.  
> > > 
> > > Don't know, if it is done at the pse-pi node level it may not break
> > > pse_regulator.c. Not sure about it.  
> > 
> > me too. Before your patch set, the regulator topology for PoDL PSE was
> > following:
> > power-source
> >   fixed-regulator
> >      PoDL_PSE-consumer
> > 
> > Now it will be:
> > power-source
> >   fixed-regulator
> >      PoDL_PSE-consumer
> >        PSE-PI-provider
> >          PSE-PI-consumer
> > 
> > By porting porting PSE framework to regulator, probably it make sense to
> > remove two levels of regulators?
> > power-source
> >   fixed-regulator
> >      PSE-PI-consumer
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to reply about this.
> This is specific to pse_regulator driver. Could we tackle this change in another
> patch series when the current patch series got applied?
> Also I don't have the hardware to test it.

ACK, no problem.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux