Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] FPGA subsystem core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If I recall correctly we simply poked at the FPGA directly from userspace. Not ideal by any means and also meant we had to have a backup recovery mechanism as it meant that the FPGA had to be programmed already as the bus interface was in soft IP.

Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 10/05/2013 08:56 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I would, but in my case it was employer-owned and closed.
>
>ok. But I believe general concept for this can be shared.
>If you used char device, sysfs, etc.
>
>Thanks,
>Michal

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux