Hi Woojung,
On 07/03/24 5:14 am, Woojung Huh - C21699 wrote:
> Hi Parthiban,
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan865x/lan865x.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan865x/lan865x.c
> ...
>> +static void lan865x_multicast_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct lan865x_priv *priv = container_of(work, struct lan865x_priv,
>> + multicast_work);
>> + u32 regval = 0;
>> +
>> + if (priv->netdev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) {
>> + /* Enabling promiscuous mode */
>> + regval |= MAC_NET_CFG_PROMISCUOUS_MODE;
>> + regval &= (~MAC_NET_CFG_MULTICAST_MODE);
>> + regval &= (~MAC_NET_CFG_UNICAST_MODE);
>> + } else if (priv->netdev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) {
>> + /* Enabling all multicast mode */
>> + regval &= (~MAC_NET_CFG_PROMISCUOUS_MODE);
>> + regval |= MAC_NET_CFG_MULTICAST_MODE;
>> + regval &= (~MAC_NET_CFG_UNICAST_MODE);
>> + } else if (!netdev_mc_empty(priv->netdev)) {
>> + lan865x_set_specific_multicast_addr(priv->netdev);
>> + regval &= (~MAC_NET_CFG_PROMISCUOUS_MODE);
>> + regval &= (~MAC_NET_CFG_MULTICAST_MODE);
>> + regval |= MAC_NET_CFG_UNICAST_MODE;
>> + } else {
>> + /* enabling local mac address only */
>> + if (oa_tc6_write_register(priv->tc6, LAN865X_REG_MAC_H_HASH,
>> + regval)) {
>
> Your intention to write 0 into LAN865X_REG_MAC_H_HASH?
> If then, using 0 than regval makes more clear.
Yes sure, will correct it in the next version.
>
>> + netdev_err(priv->netdev, "Failed to write reg_hashh");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + if (oa_tc6_write_register(priv->tc6, LAN865X_REG_MAC_L_HASH,
>> + regval)) {
>
> Same here.
Yes sure, will correct it in the next version.
Best regards,
Parthiban V
>
>> + netdev_err(priv->netdev, "Failed to write reg_hashl");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (oa_tc6_write_register(priv->tc6, LAN865X_REG_MAC_NET_CFG,
>> regval))
>> + netdev_err(priv->netdev,
>> + "Failed to enable promiscuous/multicast/normal mode");
>> +}
>> +
>
