Re: [RFC 0/8] PGP key parser using SandBox Mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/16/2024 6:21 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Petr Tesařík <petr@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:38:30 -0800
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm confused by this.  The kernel doesn't (appear to) have a PGP parser
today.  So are you saying that it *should* have one and it's only
feasible if its confined in a sandbox?

I'm sorry if this is confusing. Yes, your understanding is correct.
This patch series demonstrates that SBM (even in the initial version
that was submitted) allows to write a PGP parser which can survive
memory safety bugs withoug compromising the rest of the kernel.

So I have a different question: some years ago we added the "usermode
blob" feature for just this kind of use case - parsing firewall rules at
the time.  It has never been used for that, but it's still there in
kernel/usermode_driver.c.  Is there a reason why this existing
functionality can't be used for tasks like PGP parsing as well?

Yes, it was an option I explored last year (briefly talked about it as a BoF at LSS NA 2023).

You are right, there is such feature that seemed to fit well.

User space blob embedded in a kernel module, so signed. User space process connected only to the kernel through a pipe.

I even went ahead, and created a framework:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230317145240.363908-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

so that anyone can implement similar use cases.

The further step is: how can I ensure that the process launched by the kernel is not attacked by root (which I assumed to be less powerful than the kernel in a locked-down system).

I handled this in both directions:

- The process launched by the kernel is under a seccomp strict profile,
  and can only read/write through the pipe created by the kernel (and
  call few other system calls, such as exit()). Otherwise it is killed.
  Cannot create any new communication channel.

- I created an LSM that denies any attempt to ptrace/signal to the
  process launched by the kernel. Jann Horn also suggested to make the
  process non-swappable.

However, despite these attempts, security people don't feel confident on offloading a kernel workload outside the kernel.

This is why this work started.

Roberto





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux