Re: [RFC 0/8] PGP key parser using SandBox Mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:38:30 -0800
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/16/24 07:24, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > While I started working on my development branch to illustrate how
> > SandBox Mode could be enhanced to allow dynamic memory allocation and
> > other features necessary to convert some existing code, my colleague
> > Roberto Sassu set out and adapted a PGP key parser to run in a sandbox.
> > 
> > Disclaimer:
> > 
> > The code had to be rearranged in order to avoid memory allocations
> > and crypto operations in the sandbox. The code might contain errors.  
> 
> I'm confused by this.  The kernel doesn't (appear to) have a PGP parser
> today.  So are you saying that it *should* have one and it's only
> feasible if its confined in a sandbox?

I'm sorry if this is confusing. Yes, your understanding is correct.
This patch series demonstrates that SBM (even in the initial version
that was submitted) allows to write a PGP parser which can survive
memory safety bugs withoug compromising the rest of the kernel.

> A much more powerful example would be to take something that the kernel
> has already and put it in a sandbox.  That would show us how difficult
> it is to sandbox something versus just doing it _normally_ in the kernel.

That's what I have also tested as a PoC with an earlier version of my
patch series and a few quick hacks on top. As it happens, that code
on top needs to be adapted for the current patch series, so I cannot
post it just yet. Please, stay tuned.

> As it stands, I fear this was just the largest chunk of sandbox code
> that was laying around and it seemed like a good idea to just chuck
> ~1400 lines of code over the wall at a huge cc list.

You asked for some real-world scenarios, and this should be one.
Another is on the way, but see above why it takes a bit of time.

I am not trying to claim I'm the smartest person on this planet. I can
accept it if there is a fundamental flaw in my approach. Yet, I'd be
glad if somebody can make me a favor and at least hint at what exactly
is the issue with it. I have to admit this thing is still not quite
clear to me. I would be sad if I couldn't learn from this experience.

Petr T




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux