>> To be honest, I like this series more than the previous series. I always >> thought RDT_RESOURCE_L3_MON should have been a separate resource by itself. > > Would you prefer that your "Reviewed-by" tag be removed from the > previous series? I'm thinking that I could continue splitting things and break "struct rdt_resource" into separate "ctrl" and "mon" structures. Then we'd have a clean split from top to bottom. Doing that would get rid of the rdt_resources_all[] array. Replacing with individual rdt_hw_ctrl_resource and rdt_hw_mon_resource declarations for each feature. Features found on a system would be added to a list of ctrl or list of mon resources. -Tony
