is there any quality checking on kernel-doc that goes into kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  it seems that, as time goes by, any kernel-doc content that gets
cleaned up is simply offset by more utterly unbuildable crap that's
introduced. i just tried a simple "make htmldocs" and got screen after
screen of errors, culminating in an actual fatal error:

kernel-api.xml:9483: element refentry: validity error : ID API-kmalloc
already defined
<refentry id="API-kmalloc">

and i notice that there is *still* no fix for changing XHTML
generation back to HTML, even though that problem has existed for well
over a year.

  what is the point of encouraging people to use kerneldoc if there is
absolutely no quality control on it?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux