On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:16 AM WANG Rui <wangrui@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 6.8 Thanks, that is quite expedited... Please `rustfmt` the code to avoid failing the `rustfmtcheck` target. I see you already created the 6.8 tag but I have not seen it in linux-next yet and you did not send the PR, so it would be ideal if you could fix this before it goes to Linus. diff --git a/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs b/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs index 3edda6a10..0da52b548 100644 --- a/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs +++ b/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs @@ -163,10 +163,7 @@ fn main() { ts.push("target-pointer-width", "64"); } else if cfg.has("LOONGARCH") { ts.push("arch", "loongarch64"); - ts.push( - "data-layout", - "e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n64-S128", - ); + ts.push("data-layout", "e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n64-S128"); ts.push("features", "-f,-d"); ts.push("llvm-target", "loongarch64-linux-gnusf"); ts.push("llvm-abiname", "lp64s"); Thanks! Cheers, Miguel