On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:01:03AM +0800, Jie Luo wrote: > > > On 12/17/2023 12:09 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 10:41:28PM +0800, Jie Luo wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 12/16/2023 9:51 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:21:53AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > > The following is the chip package, the chip can work on the switch mode > > > > > > like the existed upstream code qca8k, where PHY1-PHY4 is connected with > > > > > > MAC1-MAC4 directly; > > > > > > > > > > Ah, that is new information, and has a big effect on the design. > > > > > > > > This QCA8084 that's being proposed in these patches is not a PHY in > > > > itself, but is a SoC. I came across this: > > > > > > > > https://www.rt-rk.com/android-tv-solution-tv-in-smartphone-pantsstb-based-on-qualcomm-soc-design/ > > > > > > The chip mentioned in the link you mentioned is SoC, which is not the > > > chip that the qca8084 driver work for. > > > > So there's two chips called QCA8084 both produced by Qualcomm? I find > > that hard to believe. > > > > The SoC mentioned in the link you provided is the APQ8084 that is introduced > in the link below: > https://www.qualcomm.com/products/mobile/snapdragon/smartphones/snapdragon-8-series-mobile-platforms/snapdragon-processors-805 So the one mentioned in the rt-rk article and a load of CVEs is _not_ QCA8084 but is APQ8084. Sounds like a lot of people are getting stuff wrong - which is hardly surprising as there are people that seem to _enjoy_ getting the technical details wrong. I haven't worked out if it's intentional malace, or they're just fundamentally lazy individuals who just like to screw with other people. Sigh. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
