> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 8:23 AM
> To: Song, Xiongwei <Xiongwei.Song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: sxwjean@xxxxxx; vbabka@xxxxxxx; cl@xxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx;
> penberg@xxxxxxxxxx; rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx; iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx;
> roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx; corbet@xxxxxxx; keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx;
> akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: correct the default value of slub_min_objects in doc
>
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> is safe.
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:11 PM Song, Xiongwei
> <Xiongwei.Song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hyeonggon,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 8:54 AM
> > > To: sxwjean@xxxxxx
> > > Cc: vbabka@xxxxxxx; cl@xxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; penberg@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx; iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx; roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > corbet@xxxxxxx; keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; akpm@linux-
> foundation.org;
> > > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Song,
> > > Xiongwei <Xiongwei.Song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: correct the default value of slub_min_objects in
> doc
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 9:16 AM <sxwjean@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > There is no a value assigned to slub_min_objects by default, it always
> > > > is 0 that is initialized by compiler if no assigned value by command line.
> > > > min_objects is calculated based on processor numbers in calculate_order().
> > > > For more details, see commit 9b2cd506e5f2 ("slub: Calculate min_objects
> > > > based on number of processors.")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > While slub_min_objects equals zero by default, 'min_objects' overrides it to
> > > 4 * (fls(nr_cpus) + 1) when not set. so when slub_min_objects is not
> > > set, it would be
> > > equal to or higher than 4. I'm not sure this level of implementation
> > > detail is worth documenting.
> >
> > commit 9b2cd506e5f2 ("slub: Calculate min_objects based on number of processors.")
> > has already given "processors min_objects" pair, do we really need to document
> > the specific detail?
>
> No, I don't think it needs to be documented, but neither do I think
> "slub_min_objects is
> 0 by default" is correctly documented...
>
> > > Also, I think patch 2 should update Documentation/mm/slub.rst too.
> > > (slub_$param -> slab_param)
> > I think people can know slub_$params are still supported by
> > Documentation/mm/slub.rst, so we don't need to say the info again in
> > this file. Is it better to do so just before removing slub_$params
> > completely?
>
> If we're deprecating and planning to drop slub_$params in the future,
> IMHO it'd be less confusing if we change it now, rather than
> when removing slub_$params completely (probably 10 years later)?
Ok, sure. Will update in next version.
Regards,
Xiongwei
>
> Thanks,
> Hyeonggon
>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/mm/slub.rst | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/slub.rst b/Documentation/mm/slub.rst
> > > > index be75971532f5..1f4399581449 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/mm/slub.rst
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/mm/slub.rst
> > > > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ list_lock once in a while to deal with partial slabs. That overhead
> is
> > > > governed by the order of the allocation for each slab. The allocations
> > > > can be influenced by kernel parameters:
> > > >
> > > > -.. slub_min_objects=x (default 4)
> > > > +.. slub_min_objects=x (default 0)
> > > > .. slub_min_order=x (default 0)
> > > > .. slub_max_order=x (default 3 (PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
