On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:59:55 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > I wouldn't be so sure. The alternative interpretation "for PTP, give me > timestamps from both sources" also sounds reasonable for the distant > future where that will be possible (with proper cmsg identification). > But I don't see how to distinguish the two - the filters, expressed in > these terms, would be the same. We can add an attribute that explicitly says that the configuration is only requesting one stamp. But feels like jumping the gun at this stage, given we have no other option to express there. > So the ptp4l source code would have to be modified to still work with > the same precision as before? I'm not seeing this through. We can do the opposite and add a socket flag which says "DMA is okay".
