Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: xfs: Remove duplicate 'the' in transaction sequence process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 02:14:58AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:40:54PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
> >> Remove the repeated word "the" in comments.
> >
> > Patch title looks OK but in this case, the patch description should also match.
> > Hint: there is no code comments in the doc below.
> >
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> >> index 1625d1131093..a0678101a7d0 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> >> @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ The transaction sequence looks like this:
> >>  2. The second transaction contains a physical update to the free space btrees
> >>     of AG 3 to release the former BMBT block and a second physical update to the
> >>     free space btrees of AG 7 to release the unmapped file space.
> >> -   Observe that the the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
> >> +   Observe that the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
> >>     when possible.
> >>     Attached to the transaction is a an extent free done (EFD) log item.
> >>     The EFD contains a pointer to the EFI logged in transaction #1 so that log
> >
> > Regardless, wait for one or few days before rerolling this patch with
> > reviews addressed. It allows other reviewers to catch up and review. You can
> > also Cc: me if you'd like.
> 
> Bagas, this is a patch removing an extra "the".  We do not need to make
> life this hard for such a simple fix.
> 
> Charles, the patch is good enough, no need for a third version.
> 
> (Next time, though, do wait before resubmitting a patch.  When you do,
> put a description of what changed below the "---" line.)

Thanks for the reminder!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux