Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:40:54PM +0800, Charles Han wrote: >> Remove the repeated word "the" in comments. > > Patch title looks OK but in this case, the patch description should also match. > Hint: there is no code comments in the doc below. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst >> index 1625d1131093..a0678101a7d0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst >> @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ The transaction sequence looks like this: >> 2. The second transaction contains a physical update to the free space btrees >> of AG 3 to release the former BMBT block and a second physical update to the >> free space btrees of AG 7 to release the unmapped file space. >> - Observe that the the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order >> + Observe that the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order >> when possible. >> Attached to the transaction is a an extent free done (EFD) log item. >> The EFD contains a pointer to the EFI logged in transaction #1 so that log > > Regardless, wait for one or few days before rerolling this patch with > reviews addressed. It allows other reviewers to catch up and review. You can > also Cc: me if you'd like. Bagas, this is a patch removing an extra "the". We do not need to make life this hard for such a simple fix. Charles, the patch is good enough, no need for a third version. (Next time, though, do wait before resubmitting a patch. When you do, put a description of what changed below the "---" line.) Thanks, jon
