On 2023/7/26 14:45, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:20:00AM +0800, chenjiahao (C) wrote:On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote:Hey, Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset? Thanks, Conor.Hi, My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD (commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and it seems all ok. Could you try applying with the base above, or is there any problem with that base?There's some difference between linux-next and riscv/for-next that prevents the patchwork automation from applying the patches.
Oh, I see. There is definitely a difference, since linux-next applied
a bugfix patch b690e266dae2 ("riscv: mm: fix truncation warning on RV32")
recently, whereas riscv/for-next didn't. I have worked on a wrong base
and thanks for reminding :)
I will rebase onto riscv/for-next and post my v9 pathset soon, please
check over there.
Thanks,
Jiahao
