Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
From: "chenjiahao (C)" <chenjiahao16@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:20:00 +0800
Cc: <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>, <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>, <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>, <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alex@xxxxxxxx>, <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>, <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>, <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud>
References: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0


On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote:

Hey,

Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to
riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset?

Thanks,
Conor.


Hi,

My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD
(commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and
it seems all ok.

Could you try applying with the base above, or
is there any problem with that base?

Thanks,
Jiahao

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
  - From: Conor Dooley

References:
- [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
  - From: Chen Jiahao
- Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
  - From: Conor Dooley

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Split get-reg-list test code
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]