Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > to make page Subsystems APIs more organized as requested > > Changes: > v2: added pcmcia and subtitle > > Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Alternative consolidation of buses look more challenging. > Here are too many buses, so them should be split again. > Many of buses are specific for only x86 or only embedded computers. > Is SCSI generic bus or storage bus? > --- > Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst | 19 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst b/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst > index 90a0535a932a..5ace1c434977 100644 > --- a/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst > +++ b/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst > @@ -48,6 +48,20 @@ Networking interfaces > isdn/index > mhi/index > > +Peripheral interfaces > +---------------------- > + > +except specific networking and storage interfaces > + > +.. toctree:: > + :maxdepth: 1 > + > + usb/index > + PCI/index > + hwmon/index > + leds/index > + pcmcia/index > + > Storage interfaces > ------------------ > > @@ -70,19 +84,14 @@ Storage interfaces > fpga/index > i2c/index > iio/index > - leds/index > - pcmcia/index > spi/index > w1/index > watchdog/index > virt/index > - hwmon/index > accel/index > security/index > crypto/index > bpf/index > - usb/index > - PCI/index > misc-devices/index > peci/index > wmi/index I'm sorry, but I feel like you've missed the point here - adding PCMCIA doesn't really address my concern at all. What is a "peripheral interface", and how does USB qualify but, say, SPI does not? I feel like we have stopped adding clarity at this point. A lot of this documentation needs a closer look to think about how it fits into our model. As a quick example (and an example only), the LED documentation would appear to be properly placed in the userspace-api guide, not in this grab-bag section. Just shuffling it around in the file doesn't help address problems like that, unfortunately. Thanks, jon
