Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > to make the page more organized as requested > > Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst b/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst > index 90a0535a932a..7b086c89e2be 100644 > --- a/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst > +++ b/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst > @@ -48,6 +48,17 @@ Networking interfaces > isdn/index > mhi/index > > +Peripheral interfaces > +---------------------- > + > +.. toctree:: > + :maxdepth: 1 > + > + usb/index > + PCI/index > + hwmon/index > + leds/index > + > Storage interfaces > ------------------ > > @@ -70,19 +81,15 @@ Storage interfaces > fpga/index > i2c/index > iio/index > - leds/index > pcmcia/index > spi/index > w1/index > watchdog/index > virt/index > - hwmon/index > accel/index > security/index > crypto/index > bpf/index > - usb/index > - PCI/index > misc-devices/index > peci/index > wmi/index So this one seems a bit less well thought out. How are you defining "peripheral interface"? How is it that PCI qualifies but, say, PCMCIA does not? In a real sense, most of our interfaces deal with peripherals in one way or another. Were you thinking maybe of "bus interfaces"? If so, a somewhat different selection would be indicated. Thanks, jon
