On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > -================================= > +perf_user_access (arm64 and riscv only) > +======================================= so I complained about this when support for this went in for arm64. Why do we have two separate ways of getting this info, one for x86 and one for arm64/riscv? Could we get x86 patched to use the same interface? It's a pain for tool users to have to maintain multiple code paths because the various architectures can't agree on how to export this info to userspace. Vince
