Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force disable IBRS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/23 22:58, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Hi,

On 6/27/23 19:25, Waiman Long wrote:
  Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c                   | 14 ++++++++++++--
  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst
index b799a43da62e..8604e6d1fe2c 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst
You may take or leave these comments as you choose.

@@ -216,6 +216,21 @@ are ignored).
  The idle states disabled this way can be enabled (on a per-CPU basis) from user
  space via ``sysfs``.
+The ``ibrs_off`` module parameter is a boolean flag (default to false). It is
                                                        (default false).
or
                                                        (defaults to false).

Then I think it reads better if the next sentence begins with: "If set,"
instead of having it in the middle of the sentence.

+used to control if IBRS (Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation) should be
+turned off, if set, when the CPU enters an idle state.  This flag will not
+affect CPUs that are using Enhanced IBRS which can remain on with little
+performance impact.
+
+For some CPUs, IBRS will be selected as mitigation for Spectre v2 and Retbleed
+security vulnerabilities by default.  Leaving the IBRS mode on while idling may
+have a performance impact on its sibling CPU.  The IBRS mode will be turned off
+by default when the CPU enters into a deep idle state, but not in some
+shallower ones.  Setting the ``ibrs_off`` module parameter will force the IBRS
+mode to off when the CPU is in any one of the available idle states.  This may
+help performance of a sibling CPU at the expense of a slightly higher wakeup
+latency for the idle CPU.
thanks.

Thanks for the suggestion. I will make the change if I have to revise the patch again for any reason.

Cheers,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux