On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 03:53:27PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Friday 26 July 2013 10:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>+ gpio4_sysen1, gpio5_clk32kgaudio_usb_psel, gpio6_sysen2, > >Would it not be easier to just name the GPIOs gpioN rather than using > >the full names with the possible functions? > I took the name approach as what we have on Tegra. > But I think I can put the name of the pins same as what we have in > datasheet. So pin name will be exact same as what we have in > datasheet. That will be easy to interpret. I was thinking more about ease of typing than ease of understanding here!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
