On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:45:54PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > +pins: gpio0_id, gpio1_vbus_det_led1_pwm1, gpio2_regen_led2_pwm2, gpio3_chrg_det, > + gpio4_sysen1, gpio5_clk32kgaudio_usb_psel, gpio6_sysen2, > + gpio7_msecure_pwrhold, gpio8_sim1rsti, gpio9_low_vbat, > + gpio10_wireless_chrg1, gpio11_rcm, gpio12_sim2rsto, gpio13, gpio14, > + gpio15_sim2rsti, vac, powergood_usb_psel, nreswarm, pwrdown, > + gpadc_start, reset_in, nsleep, enable1, enable2, int. Would it not be easier to just name the GPIOs gpioN rather than using the full names with the possible functions?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
