On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 11:56:37PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:28:32AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > All the other "bug" code in identify_secondary_cpu() *is* > > vendor-specific. > > I meant "vendor-specific" in the sense that AMD code goes to amd.c, etc. Hm? So code in bugs.c is not vendor-specific? That seems circular and I don't get your point. > As to the identify_secondary_cpu() code - I didn't like it being > slapped there either but it got stuck in there hastily during the > mitigations upstreaming as back then we had bigger fish to fry than > paying too much attention to clean design... Right, so rather than spreading all the bug-related MSR logic around, just do it in one spot. -- Josh
