Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: bpf: Add missing line break separator in node_data struct code block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 4:33 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell reported htmldocs warning when merging bpf-next tree,
> which was the same warning as reported by kernel test robot:
>
> Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst:62: ERROR: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 12 supplied.
>
> The error is due to Sphinx confuses node_data struct declaration with
> code-block directive option.
>
> Fix the warning by separating the code-block marker with node_data struct
> declaration.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230215144505.4751d823@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202302151123.wUE5FYFx-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> Fixes: c31315c3aa0929 ("bpf, documentation: Add graph documentation for non-owning refs")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst b/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst
> index 8bbf1815efe784..61274622b71d85 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ The new-style data structures are intrusive and are defined similarly to their
>  vanilla kernel counterparts:
>
>  .. code-block:: c
> +
>          struct node_data {

Applied to bpf-next.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux