[PATCH 2/3] Documentation: bpf: Add missing line break separator in node_data struct code block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Rothwell reported htmldocs warning when merging bpf-next tree,
which was the same warning as reported by kernel test robot:

Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst:62: ERROR: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 12 supplied.

The error is due to Sphinx confuses node_data struct declaration with
code-block directive option.

Fix the warning by separating the code-block marker with node_data struct
declaration.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230215144505.4751d823@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202302151123.wUE5FYFx-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Fixes: c31315c3aa0929 ("bpf, documentation: Add graph documentation for non-owning refs")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst b/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst
index 8bbf1815efe784..61274622b71d85 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/graph_ds_impl.rst
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ The new-style data structures are intrusive and are defined similarly to their
 vanilla kernel counterparts:
 
 .. code-block:: c
+
         struct node_data {
           long key;
           long data;
-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux