Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Monday, 23 January 2023 14:51:57 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> > Please disregard this patch. >> > I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch >> > submissions, which is the following: >> > >> > I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error, >> > incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the >> > copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license. >> > >> > Apologies for the noise. >> >> Glad to reply, but I see your reply above as if it is written by >> a bot. Care to vary your sentences? > > I already got a bounce as I am now considered a spammer :-/ No, I don't think anybody sees you as that. Please do not worry about Bagas; he is fond of unnecessarily picking holes in the work of others. > So now I got to figure out how to fix this clusterfsck, without being seen as > a spammer/bot, while also trying to minimize the burden on others. You tried a fix which, as was pointed out, was not the right direction. Just drop it and move onto your next contribution, and all will be well. Thanks, jon
