On Monday, 23 January 2023 03:15:15 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Similar response as [1]. Please disregard this patch. I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch submissions, which is the following: I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error, incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license. Apologies for the noise.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
