Hi, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes: > Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes: >>> I think I'm going to hold off on this one. As I said before, it would >>> have made sense to do things this way when we made the transition. At >>> this point, though, I think the potential for trouble outweighs the >>> benefits that would come from moving things around in this way. >> >> OK. The potential for troubles would lie with the scripts to deploy the >> doc to the web site, I'd guess? If that's the place we'd expect >> problems, I'm happy to be pointed to it and can try adjusting the >> scripts for the change. > > The trouble lies in any number of scripts at any number of sites; > calling this an ABI change would be a stretch, but some of the same > concerns apply. Right. I wouldn't be too concerned with sites other than the main Linux documentation site, though? > Getting the docs build on kernel.org updated would not be a huge > problem, I think, but I don't know what else might break. > > We can reconsider this, but not before the merge window. Understood. Thanks for the follow up! Should I resend when the next window opens? -- Thanks, Maxim
