Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Jonathan, > > Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes: >> I think I'm going to hold off on this one. As I said before, it would >> have made sense to do things this way when we made the transition. At >> this point, though, I think the potential for trouble outweighs the >> benefits that would come from moving things around in this way. > > OK. The potential for troubles would lie with the scripts to deploy the > doc to the web site, I'd guess? If that's the place we'd expect > problems, I'm happy to be pointed to it and can try adjusting the > scripts for the change. The trouble lies in any number of scripts at any number of sites; calling this an ABI change would be a stretch, but some of the same concerns apply. Getting the docs build on kernel.org updated would not be a huge problem, I think, but I don't know what else might break. We can reconsider this, but not before the merge window. Thanks, jon
