Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:01:16 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> So the purpose of this backmerge would be just to get rid of a few >> warnings in docs-next for the next few weeks? Given the jaundiced eye >> with which Linus looks at backmerges, I'm inclined to just wait and let >> it all settle out during the merge window. Is there any work that would >> be impeded by not doing that merge now? > I thought the backmerge might reduce your annoyance when test-building > for the next merge window with Sphinx >=3.1. > You call those dozes of warnings *a few*. > Of course, I can wait. :-) Hey, I raised two kids, I'm good at dealing with annoyance...:) Thanks, jon
