On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:01:16 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So the purpose of this backmerge would be just to get rid of a few
> warnings in docs-next for the next few weeks? Given the jaundiced eye
> with which Linus looks at backmerges, I'm inclined to just wait and let
> it all settle out during the merge window. Is there any work that would
> be impeded by not doing that merge now?
I thought the backmerge might reduce your annoyance when test-building
for the next merge window with Sphinx >=3.1.
You call those dozes of warnings *a few*.
Of course, I can wait. :-)
Thanks, Akira
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
