On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 03:20:34PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2022-11-07 13:18:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:03:55PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > > dump_page() uses %pGp format to print 'flags' field of struct page.
> > > As some page flags (e.g. PG_buddy, see page-flags.h for more details)
> > > are set in page_type field, introduce %pGt format which provides
> > > human readable output of page_type. And use it in dump_page().
> > >
> > > Note that the sense of bits are different in page_type. if page_type is
> > > 0xffffffff, no flags are set. if PG_slab (0x00100000) flag is set,
> > > page_type is 0xffefffff. Clearing a bit means we set the bit. Bits in
> > > page_type are inverted when printing type names.
> > >
> > > Below is examples of dump_page(). One is just after alloc_pages() and
> > > the other is after __SetPageSlab().
> > >
> > > [ 1.814728] page:ffffea000415e200 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x105788
> > > [ 1.815961] flags: 0x17ffffc0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> >
> > > [ 1.816443] page_type: 0xffffffff()
> >
Thank you both for looking at this! :-)
> > Why do we have empty parentheses? I would expect either something there, or no
> > parentheses at all.
>
> This looks fine. format_page_flags() does the same for %pGp.
>
> > ...
> >
> > > + %pGt 0xffefffff(slab)
> >
> > No space before ( ?
>
> Also looks fine. %pGp does the same.
>
> > ...
> >
> > > +static
> > > +char *format_page_type(char *buf, char *end, unsigned int page_type)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!(page_type & PAGE_TYPE_BASE))
> > > + return string(buf, end, "no type for user-mapped page", default_str_spec);
> >
> > It's too long, can we make it shorten?
>
> I wonder if it would help to write the value. Something like:
>
> page_type: 0x0ace5768(no type)
>
> That said. I am not familiar with the page types and am not sure
> about the semantic of this value. MM people should decide what they
> want to see in this case.
Hmm, then for consistency let's try:
- 0xffefffff(slab)
- 0xffffffff()
- 0x0ace5768()
this way.
> > ...
> >
> > > pr_warn("%sflags: %pGp%s\n", type, &head->flags,
> > > page_cma ? " CMA" : "");
> > > + pr_warn("page_type: %pGt\n", &head->page_type);
> > > +
> > > print_hex_dump(KERN_WARNING, "raw: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 32,
> > > sizeof(unsigned long), page,
> > > sizeof(struct page), false);
> > > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> > > index cb4c663a714e..956eaa9f12c0 100644
> > > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > > @@ -773,6 +773,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH */
> > >
> > > extern const struct trace_print_flags pageflag_names[];
> > > +extern const struct trace_print_flags pagetype_names[];
> > > extern const struct trace_print_flags vmaflag_names[];
> > > extern const struct trace_print_flags gfpflag_names[];
> >
> > I would split this to a separate change, but it's up to PRINTK maintainers.
>
> I guess that you are talking about the line:
>
> + pr_warn("page_type: %pGt\n", &head->page_type);
>
>
> Yes, it would be better to have implementation of %pGt modifier
> in one patch and add the user in another one.
Sounds reasonable.
Will split its caller into another patch next to this one.
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
