On 10/17/22 21:36, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
On 2022/10/17 23:41, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 01:06:36PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
Hi,
Minor nit on language code.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:24:53 -0500, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
Start the process of translating kernel documentation to Spanish. Create
sp_SP/ and include an index and a disclaimer, following the approach of
prior translations. Add Carlos Bilbao as MAINTAINER of this translation
effort.
IIUC, the language code for "Spanish (Spain)" should be "es-ES", as is
listed at e.g., https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lingoes.net%2Fen%2Ftranslator%2Flangcode.htm&data=05%7C01%7Ccarlos.bilbao%40amd.com%7C44c226d534f44b4afc1f08dab0b1893b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638016573808784843%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bTm9yjEtum2LkTFkN1kZphytfVKN9Si2Ypk7j6s%2FaVw%3D&reserved=0.
The other translations use directory names found in the table, with
"-" replaced with "_". It would be better to be consistent.
I don't know what standard we're actually following. RFC5646 suggests
simply using "es", with "es-419" for Latin America specialisation or
"es-ES" for Spain. I don't know how much variation there is between
different Spanish dialects for technical documents; as I understand it,
it's worth supporting two dialects of Chinese, but we merrily mix &
match en_US and en_GB spellings. Similarly, I wouldn't suggest that we
have separate translations for fr_CA, fr_CH, fr_FR, just a single 'fr'
would be fine.
We do need to be careful here; people are rightfully sensitive about
being incorrectly grouped together. If possible we should find a
standard to follow that's been defined by experts in these matters.
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FIETF_language_tag&data=05%7C01%7Ccarlos.bilbao%40amd.com%7C44c226d534f44b4afc1f08dab0b1893b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638016573808784843%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3T9bPQzcj9hEuZiPkjIU%2BPCEaxAivgaNKZ2gL5m3OQA%3D&reserved=0 may be a good place to
start looking.
I think generic "es" is OK, especially if "es_ES" can have such a
negative connotation to some. I just wanted to point out "sp_SP"
looks wrong.
Carlos, if you go the "es" way, it would be better to mention the
reason of the choice in the Changelog for future reference.
Subdirectories "ja_JP", "ko_KR", and "zh_CN" were added under
Documentation/ way back in 2007 (v2.6.23).
As you might see, two of the three language codes needed region
distinction and they were reasonable choices at the time.
Thanks, Akira
Answering to Akira and Matthew below. Thanks to both for valuable feedback.
I made the conscious choice of not using es_ES, because as mentioned, it
references a standard that I don’t intend to follow myself or enforce on
Spanish translations. es_ES is a standard that comes from “Esp”-aña (Spain,
the country) whereas “sp_SP” is as in "Sp"-anish, the language, not the
country. Regarding this, I took the liberty of adding an extra paragraph to
index.rs. I would translate it to English like:
"Many countries speak Spanish, each one with its own culture, expressions,
and sometimes significant grammatical differences. The translators are free
to use the version of Spanish which they are most comfortable with. In
principle, these small differences should not pose a great barrier for
speakers of different versions of Spanish, albeit in case of doubt, you can
ask the maintainers."
I also opted for not using es_ES due to its geographical connotations. If
someone from Peru, Mexico, Argentina, … submits a translation tomorrow, I
would review it and we would understand each other just fine. Even within
“Spain” there are many dialects and things change within regions. I
reiterate that all dialects should be allowed in this directory.
Fortunately for us, versions of Spanish differ much more in spoken form
than they do when written. This does not happen between traditional and
simplified Chinese.
On top of everything else, using locale es_ES may imply that spell checks
on that directory using the locale es_ES would be clean, but this is very
far from reality, among other things, because all the English terms we
inherit regarding computers. As Miguel Ojeda pointed out somewhere in this
thread, there are terms that is better if we do not translate, to favor
understanding of code/other documents.
I will update the corresponding commit message to clarify why we are using
es_ES format in this particular case.
Best regards,
Carlos
