On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:54:17PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Jun, at 02:46:09PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> > Eventually we'll need to look at how this interacts with kexec. A >> > kexec'd kernel will need to use the mapping already chosen by a >> > previous kernel, but that's an issue for another patch series. >> >> FYI, this is exactly what Borislav has been tackling on x86 recently. It >> would be nice if we could find one scheme that suits everyone. > > Is this arm 32 or 64-bit? Because we haven't talked about 32-bit on x86 > either. From skimming over the code, I'm not sure the same top-down > allocation and 1:1 mapping would work there. But I haven't looked hard > yet so I dunno. This is arm 32. We'll be looking at arm 64 next. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
