On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:54:17PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun, at 02:46:09PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Eventually we'll need to look at how this interacts with kexec. A
> > kexec'd kernel will need to use the mapping already chosen by a
> > previous kernel, but that's an issue for another patch series.
>
> FYI, this is exactly what Borislav has been tackling on x86 recently. It
> would be nice if we could find one scheme that suits everyone.
Is this arm 32 or 64-bit? Because we haven't talked about 32-bit on x86
either. From skimming over the code, I'm not sure the same top-down
allocation and 1:1 mapping would work there. But I haven't looked hard
yet so I dunno.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
