Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 7:34 PM <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 02:37:32PM -0700, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:04:25PM -0700, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>> + if (fid != FEATURE_ID_AFU && fid != PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR &&
> >>>> + fid != PORT_FEATURE_ID_UINT && fid != FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR) {
> >>>> + v = readq(base);
> >>>> + v = FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, v);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (v == 1) {
> >>>> + v = readq(base + DFHv1_CSR_SIZE_GRP);
> >>>
> >>> I am already lost what v keeps...
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps
> >>>
> >>> v = readq(base);
> >>> switch (FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, v)) {
> >>> case 1:
> >>> ...
> >>> break;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> How about?
> >> if (FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, readq(base)) == 1) {
> >> ...
> >> }
> >
> > This one tends to be expanded in the future, so I would keep it switch case.
> >
>
> I'm okay with using the switch statement, but how about the following?
>
> switch (FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, readq(base))) {
> case 1:
> ...
> break;
> }
Would it make sense to print an error if a newer version than 1 is detected?
BTW, what is the expected value when DFHv1 is not detected? Zero
or an arbitrary number?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
