Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 06:54:59AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Additionally to the "commit <sha1> upstream." variant, "[ Upstream > > commit <sha1> ]" is used as well as alternative to refer to the upstream > > commit hash. > > > > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > So this is a nit but... > > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > > index c61865e91f52..2fd8aa593a28 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > > @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ text, like this: > > > > commit <sha1> upstream. > > > > +or alternatively: > > + > > +.. code-block:: none > > + > > + [ Upstream commit <sha1> ] > > Can this just be: > > or alternatively:: > > [ Upstream commit <sha1> ] > > That extra RST markup just clutters things without any advantage. Okay, I just have sent a v2 dropping it. Salvatore
