Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Additionally to the "commit <sha1> upstream." variant, "[ Upstream > commit <sha1> ]" is used as well as alternative to refer to the upstream > commit hash. > > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) So this is a nit but... > diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > index c61865e91f52..2fd8aa593a28 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ text, like this: > > commit <sha1> upstream. > > +or alternatively: > + > +.. code-block:: none > + > + [ Upstream commit <sha1> ] Can this just be: or alternatively:: [ Upstream commit <sha1> ] That extra RST markup just clutters things without any advantage. Thanks, jon