On 6/1/22 17:59, Huacai Chen wrote:
<snip> Huacai Chen(24): irqchip: Adjust Kconfig for Loongson. irqchip/loongson-liointc: Fix build error for LoongArch. Documentation: LoongArch: Add basic documentations. Documentation/zh_CN: Add basic LoongArch documentations. LoongArch: Add elf-related definitions. LoongArch: Add writecombine support for drm. LoongArch: Add build infrastructure. LoongArch: Add CPU definition headers. LoongArch: Add atomic/locking headers. LoongArch: Add other common headers. LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines. LoongArch: Add exception/interrupt handling. LoongArch: Add process management. LoongArch: Add memory management. LoongArch: Add system call support. LoongArch: Add signal handling support. LoongArch: Add elf and module support. LoongArch: Add misc common routines. LoongArch: Add some library functions. LoongArch: Add PCI controller support. LoongArch: Add VDSO and VSYSCALL support. LoongArch: Add multi-processor (SMP) support. LoongArch: Add Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) support. LoongArch: Add Loongson-3 default config file. Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I have gone through every of these patches, and they now all look good to me. Thanks for all the revisions and cooperation!
I remember several more people have left comments on the v11 code; Eric commented on the signal handling bits and Ard may have something to say on the UEFI part. The first two cleanup patches to irqchip are previously sent in a separate series, and they are already trivial enough, but Marc may want to give the ack here too, for the patches to go in via the asm-generic tree.
At this time, although the port currently cannot work on any real hardware, the value is mostly for unblocking downstream development starting from the libc's, as the userspace ABI has been stable for several months already and there's probably no point in delaying even further. I've been working on the Gentoo/LoongArch port since August 2021 and experienced every ABI break since then, so I probably know enough to make this statement.
I think, with the userspace ABI effectively stable already, and other implementation details available for continued improvement, we could make it into this merge window after all. People, please take a final quick look at this; your opinions and/or review and acks are appreciated.
