On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:16:59AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:18:34PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > So, the biggest problem here has been patch 4 (having to have a hack to > > deploy this stuff is a bit worrying) plus the general not having a real > > driver thing. > Patch #4 in this series was a hack as it was not properly split up and > organized as a proper DTS series -it was meant as a proof of concept - > not entirely meant to indicate the remaining 1-3 patches were hacks > :). The way it reads is that you're building up to a hack - if what you've done isn't enabling a sensible solution there might be a problem with the earlier steps. > I think you mean http://marc.info/?t=137059249100003&r=1&w=2 series. I > will dig into it. if it is possible for Tegra and OMAP to use the same > framework and strategy to deal with these kind of h/w blocks, all the > more better. Not just better, if each system doing this sort of thing needs to reinvent the wheel something is going wrong.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
