Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 4/21/22 04:34, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>> Thanks, Jon! I have also been thinking whether this filename
>>> ('changes.rst') is a good description of the file contents. Do you think
>>> renaming it to something like 'requirements.rst' and updating its
>>> references would be a good patch?
>>
>> It's best not to rename things unnecessarily, especially relatively
>> well-known files that a lot of people expect to find in a specific
>> place. We've done a lot of renaming over the last few years, but this
>> is one I might let slide for now.
>>
>
> Did you mean the rename will be benefical?
No, I would not do the rename at this time.
jon
