On 4/21/22 04:34, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Thanks, Jon! I have also been thinking whether this filename
>> ('changes.rst') is a good description of the file contents. Do you think
>> renaming it to something like 'requirements.rst' and updating its
>> references would be a good patch?
>
> It's best not to rename things unnecessarily, especially relatively
> well-known files that a lot of people expect to find in a specific
> place. We've done a lot of renaming over the last few years, but this
> is one I might let slide for now.
>
Did you mean the rename will be benefical?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
