On 4/21/22 04:34, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Thanks, Jon! I have also been thinking whether this filename >> ('changes.rst') is a good description of the file contents. Do you think >> renaming it to something like 'requirements.rst' and updating its >> references would be a good patch? > > It's best not to rename things unnecessarily, especially relatively > well-known files that a lot of people expect to find in a specific > place. We've done a lot of renaming over the last few years, but this > is one I might let slide for now. > Did you mean the rename will be benefical? -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara