Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/03/2022 16:32, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> [...]
> For future reference, a far better changelog would have been something
> like:
> 
> 	Remove the duplicated sentence from locktypes.rst
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

Thanks Jon, and feel free to change that when applying in case you
prefer, it's a good choice of words, better than mine.
Cheers,


Guilherme



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux