[PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Unless it was duplicate on purpose, to emphasize that a raw_spinlock_t
is always a spinning lock regardless of PREEMPT_RT or kernel config,
it's a bit odd that this text is duplicate. So, this patch just clean
it up, keeping the consistency with the other sections of the text.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 919e9e6395cf ("Documentation: Add lock ordering and nesting documentation")
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
index bfa75ea1b66a..9933faad4771 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
@@ -211,9 +211,6 @@ raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t
 raw_spinlock_t
 --------------
 
-raw_spinlock_t is a strict spinning lock implementation regardless of the
-kernel configuration including PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels.
-
 raw_spinlock_t is a strict spinning lock implementation in all kernels,
 including PREEMPT_RT kernels.  Use raw_spinlock_t only in real critical
 core code, low-level interrupt handling and places where disabling
-- 
2.35.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux