Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm not sure, why these notices need to stay at the top, but that's what > Jonathat Corbet replied to my version 1. Because that's how we do things with kernel code. > Anyways, I've cleaned them up a little. Looks good? > > My name's included as the refreshing force of this venerable script. Not sure if the text movement done so far crosses the bar where copyright can be asserted or not...but I doubt anybody cares enough to fight you on it :) > * Transform documentation into POD (14/15) > See step 1 for the series details. > > (Still not sure about this tag line, so please correct, let me know, etc.) > > Suggested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> Responding to review comments doesn't normally require a tag like this unless the comment led to something new and significantly different. I don't think it's needed here. What you can do is note that you've responded to the comment below the "---" line. > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > scripts/kernel-doc | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Thanks, jon
