Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jonathan Corbet suggested in a reply to my version 1, that these records > can go, since that's what the git log is for. I don't agree. > > The log begins at 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2. That's from > 2005. One of those entries is indeed logged, so kudos for having me check > this. But not the older ones. Of course they can be found indirectly, > but then... > > Why not just let them embellish the script tail? > > As you can see, they don't even require any formatting there. > > Are you sure you don't want them? Do you really want this kind of stuff in the patch changelog for all time? Yes, I still believe that this information can go. Why preserve a tiny subset of a few small changes from over 20 years ago? Just take it out, please. > * Transform documentation into POD (12/15) > See step 1 for the series details. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > scripts/kernel-doc | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) Thanks, jon
