On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 at 03:51, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:22:20PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 07:50:30PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > Anshuman Khandual (7): > > > arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition > > > arm64: errata: Add detection for TRBE ignored system register writes > > > arm64: errata: Add detection for TRBE invalid prohibited states > > > arm64: errata: Add detection for TRBE trace data corruption > > > coresight: trbe: Work around the ignored system register writes > > > coresight: trbe: Work around the invalid prohibited states > > > coresight: trbe: Work around the trace data corruption > > > > > > Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 6 + > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 59 ++++++++++ > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 + > > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 27 +++++ > > > arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 3 + > > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 114 ++++++++++++++----- > > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.h | 8 -- > > > 7 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > > I have applied this set and sent a pull request to Catalin for the arm64 > > portion. > > Well, I'm happy for the whole series to go in via Greg's tree or however > the coresight patches go in (that's why I acked them). The last three > patches depend on the first four, so you might as well send them all > together. I'd split the series only if there's a conflict with the arm64 > tree (I haven't checked). > Very well - thanks for the follow up. > -- > Catalin