Hi,
On Monday 27 May 2013 11:52 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Monday 27 May 2013 11:38 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
On 05/27/2013 02:54 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 27 May 2013 11:04 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Kishon,
I have some comment about this patch
and upload modified patch to following repository (extcon-for-palmas).
-
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/commit/?h=extcon-for-palmas&id=f2b7cb80699cbe1a5fd6c97ef2c600915f8d7f2c
This patchset include patch related to other module
,so I need your opinion to apply this patchset to git repository.
yeah.. Still there is some confusion with palmas_set_switch_smps10().
I think we can remove it for now and add it separately later. By this
at least we can have device mode fully functional in OMAP5. What do
you think?
I agree your opinion.
But, I propose some fixes about palmas_set_switch_smps10().
I dont' prefer to call global function in exton-palmas.c from
palmas-regulator.c.
So, Why don't you use regulator consumer instead of global function?
You can register specific regulator for enabling or disabling
SMPS10_SWITCH_EN
and then control SMPS10_SWITCH_EN bit through regulator framework in
extcon-palmas.c
without calling global function.
Along with this, I also like to make the VBUS regulator control to be
optional here. Currently it is mandatory.
But dint you just tell on my v4 of this patch that you don’t require this.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg10638.html
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
