Matt, On 1/24/2013 3:07 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:21:42AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote: >> >>>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses >>>> an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only >>>> a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP >>>> DMA) found on the DaVinci family of SoCs. >> >>> Will you take this series through the OMAP tree? Only 1/14 touches >>> mach-davinci and I am mostly okay with it except some changes I just >>> requested Matt to make in another thread. >> >> Is this series somewhere near actually getting merged then? It seemed >> like there was lots of stuff going on. > > The issues raised by Sekhar and Santosh were reasonably minor and will > be addressed. My major concern is that the dependency on some api to > fetch dmaengine driver SG limitations is not resolved. That's being > discussed in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/10/432 It might be worth posting the patches which don't have dependencies and are ready for acceptance as a separate series. That way at least some of these patches have a good chance of getting into v3.9 if not the entire series. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
